Is it typical to not tell parents their child received intensive reading support and progress monitoring in K-2?

[AM23]

Hi!  We're in southeast PA. My 8th grade son qualifies for an IEP under Autism. 2e. Very into math, science, and figuring out how things work. He learns well by doing and watching videos. Reading and writing are weak areas. I recently requested most of his education records. Among the info we asked for was DIBELS info and received the attached document showing that my son received reading support and progress monitoring in K-2nd that my husband and I were never informed of.  Is this normal? This feels like a huge violation of trust, but maybe this is typical. We have been very open with the school and shared a lot of information with them in the spirit of collaboration.

We first had concerns in K and brought them to his teachers and the school counselors attention in first and second grades. The feedback was that he was doing great, and they had no concerns which I have in emails. All I ever heard was, "We have no concerns." I had a lot of concerns! His first grade teacher asked my son why he was giving us such a hard time with homework and refused to do any or to read or write at home. (There were behaviors at home with reading and writing including refusal, frustration, anger, and yelling.) My son later told me he couldn't understand why other kids were reading chapter books and he wasn't. My gut kept telling me something wasn't right. When I verbally asked about an evaluation in 2nd grade, I was told he wouldn't qualify and was just a little "quirky".  (I didn't know to put this in writing at the time.) We have continually been made to feel that we are making a big deal out of nothing. He has had some writing support over the years that has been hit or miss. School staff continue to say his reading is fine, but his reading is pretty limited to comics and magazines, and he has a lot of difficulty with spelling and writing (mechanics, grammar, and getting thoughts out wise.) School has agreed to accommodations for writing and reading.   At his annual IEP meeting in May, school staff casually mentioned that because he met his writing goal, they no longer consider him to have writing needs despite his writing being riddled with grammar and spelling errors when not typing and using spell/grammar check. We're asking for a reevaluation in writing, auditory processing, and reading to help sort this out. His IEP does not match him and what he needs. 

Now, I am wondering if there are there other documents I should request from the school? (We received a counseling contact log, report cards, attendance records, and DIBELS and associated progress monitoring. I was permitted to view evaluations and special ed records at the district office. In their replies, the school considered this a FERPA request.)

Also, I reviewed his reevaluation protocols from 6th grade at the district office to see what his writing looked like, since we have significant concerns about this area. I asked to review the protocols for his initial school evaluation from 4th grade (prompted after we presented a private evaluation to school staff at beginning of 4th). I was told that staff couldn't find the protocols and they think they were destroyed which is permitted after 6 months. Should I expect the 6th grade protocols to be destroyed at some point, too? This seems ridiculous, because then there is no record of his writing from those evaluations. The school refuses to give us copies of his writing from the evals, because we aren't professionals. 

What do I do with this new info that we weren't told about? How does this affect our relationship with school staff?

Thanks!

 DIBELS xname.pdfDIBELS xname.pdf

[AM23]

Hi, again.  

I'm providing some more info, as I am not sure that the document I attached is viewable. What it shows is that my son received intensive and strategic reading support in k and first grades. He had a mix of intensive, strategic, and core support in 3rd (coded red, yellow, green). In the student rostering section the following is listed under "Progress Monitoring":

K No

1st Yes

2nd Yes (disabled)

3rd No

We didn't receive any info past 3rd grade, so I am guessing DIBELS wasn't used from 4th grade on. 

I'm confused and wondering why "disabled" is listed in 2nd grade progress monitoring, while we were verbally told this same year that the school would not do an evaluation as he wouldn't qualify for an IEP. They said that he was doing great and teachers had no concerns. Am I just misunderstanding regular classroom support, RTI/MTSS, and special education? 

 

Thanks.